Xbox defends AA batteries in controllers amid industry shift to rechargeable

Why Xbox still uses AA batteries

Microsoft’s Xbox Series X controller, revealed in December 2019, continues to use AA batteries, a decision that stands out in the gaming industry. Sony and Nintendo have shifted to internal rechargeable batteries in their controllers, starting with the PlayStation 3 and Wii U, respectively. Microsoft, however, has maintained AA batteries as the default for its standard Xbox controllers.

The original Xbox console launched with a wired controller, while the Xbox 360 introduced a wireless version powered by AA batteries. This design persisted into the Xbox Series X era, despite industry trends moving toward built-in rechargeable solutions.

Consumer preferences remain divided

Microsoft argues that its approach caters to diverse user preferences. Jason Ronald, Partner Director of Program Management at Xbox, stated that the split in opinion among gamers reflects feedback the company has received. Roughly half of Xbox users prefer AA batteries for their convenience, particularly the ability to swap them quickly during gameplay.

Others favor rechargeable batteries, as they eliminate the need for frequent replacements and can be charged between sessions. Microsoft offers a rechargeable battery pack for $24.99 as an alternative, framing the choice as a feature rather than a limitation.

Critics of Microsoft’s approach point out that internal rechargeable batteries reduce waste and long-term costs. They also note that if an internal battery fails, users may need to replace the entire controller, whereas AA batteries can be swapped indefinitely.

Duracell hints at partnership with Xbox

Duracell, the battery manufacturer, suggested a partnership with Xbox in a statement to Engadget. Luke Anderson, Duracell UK’s Marketing Manager, claimed there has always been collaboration between the two companies. Microsoft, however, did not confirm any formal agreement.

This exchange has fueled speculation about whether Duracell benefits from Microsoft’s continued use of AA batteries. Neither company has provided further details about the nature or terms of such a partnership.

What this means

Lazyfounder analysis — our interpretation, not reported fact.

Microsoft’s decision to stick with AA batteries in its Xbox controllers reflects a broader strategy of prioritizing user choice over industry trends. While competitors have embraced internal rechargeable batteries, Microsoft’s approach caters to a segment of gamers who value the convenience of disposable batteries. This choice also leaves room for partnerships with battery manufacturers like Duracell, though the company has not formalized any agreements.

For founders and operators in hardware or consumer electronics, this story underscores how design choices can become a point of differentiation—even when they defy industry norms. Microsoft’s approach shows that flexibility can be a selling point, but it also risks alienating users who prioritize sustainability or cost-efficiency. The lack of a confirmed partnership with Duracell also highlights how companies can leverage ambiguity in marketing without committing to formal ties.

Related on Lazyfounder

• Microsoft
• PlayStation
• Nintendo
• More technology news