Skip to content

News publishers challenge India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act in Supreme Court

A group of 21 news publishers, represented by the Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA), has filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of India challenging the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023. The publishers argue that the Act’s provisions threaten investigative journalism and press freedom, and the case is scheduled for hearing on October 27.

Editor, Lazyfounder

Published 3 min read
News publishers challenge India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act in Supreme Court
Image: Inc42 via source

Why the lawsuit was filed

The Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA), representing 21 news publishers, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India challenging the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023. The publishers argue that the Act’s provisions could undermine investigative journalism, expose confidential sources, and curtail press freedom.

Key provisions under challenge

The DNPA’s petition targets several provisions of the DPDP Act, including consent requirements for processing personal data, individuals’ rights to withdraw consent and request data erasure, and government powers to seek information from organizations. The publishers contend that these provisions could force them to notify subjects of investigations, potentially allowing them to destroy evidence or intimidate witnesses.

The publishers also argue that the Act’s lack of exemptions for journalistic activities could compel them to remove or redact factual news reports in response to data erasure requests. Additionally, they claim that government access to information could expose whistleblowers and deter them from sharing critical details about corruption or malpractice.

Government exemptions and industry concerns

The DNPA has highlighted what it describes as a disparity in the DPDP Act’s treatment of the state and the press. While the government has been granted broad exemptions, the publishers argue that no corresponding protections exist for journalistic activities. They seek the quashing of provisions set to take effect in May 2027, claiming these could disproportionately impact investigative reporting.

The DPDP Act, enacted in August 2023, imposes financial penalties of up to ₹250 Cr for violations, including failing to implement reasonable security safeguards. The publishers argue that these penalties, combined with the Act’s compliance requirements, could create operational challenges for news organizations.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the case on October 27. The DNPA’s members include major publishers such as Network18, NDTV, Indian Express, and Times Internet, which could amplify the lawsuit’s impact on the broader media industry.

What this means

Lazyfounder analysis — our interpretation, not reported fact.

The outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for how data protection laws intersect with press freedom in India. For founders and operators in the media and digital publishing sectors, the case highlights the need to assess compliance risks under the DPDP Act, particularly around consent requirements, data erasure, and government access to information. If the court rules in favor of the publishers, it may create exemptions that ease operational burdens for investigative journalism. Conversely, a ruling upholding the Act could reinforce the need for robust data governance frameworks, especially for organizations handling sensitive information. The industry will be watching closely, as the decision could influence how other sectors—such as fintech or healthtech—navigate similar regulatory challenges.

Sources

  1. Inc42 · 2026-10-26
    News Publishers Move SC To Challenge The DPDP Act

This story is an original summary drafted with AI by Lazyfounder from the reporting listed above and checked by automated validation. Facts are attributed to their original publishers; sections marked as analysis are Lazyfounder's. Where a source is in another language, facts were machine-translated and quotations are reported, not reproduced. Read the original coverage via the links, and see our AI policy and corrections policy.

About the author

Editor, Lazyfounder

Tarun Mottlia edits LazyFounders, covering Indian startups, funding rounds, AI and product launches. Every story on the site is AI-assisted and checked against its cited sources before publication.

More stories by Tarun Mottlia

Get the LazyFounder Brief

Startup, funding and AI news in a five-minute read. Join the early-access list.

Lazy Founder - Powered by Blogy.in

Contact us

Have a story tip, correction or partnership idea?

Write to us at tarun.kumar@blogy.in or talk to the founder directly. We read every message.

Contact us