New York City proposes ban on biometric data collection in public venues
New York City is advancing legislation to ban the collection of biometric data in public places, including facial recognition, targeting practices by venues like Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSG). The move follows public criticism of MSG’s surveillance methods, which include tracking individuals across and outside venues and maintaining a database with unclear labels.
Editor, Lazyfounder

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani criticized Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSG) for its use of facial recognition and other surveillance technologies.
- City Council member Shahana Hanif introduced legislation to ban the collection of biometric data, including facial recognition, in public places across New York City.
- MSG owner James Dolan uses facial recognition to track individuals across and outside venues, including maintaining a database labeling some visitors as “LGBTQIA” without clear justification.
- A woman was banned from a Dolan-owned venue in 2021 after facial recognition identified her as an attorney at a law firm involved in litigation against MSG.
- New York City has required businesses to disclose biometric data collection since 2021.
Legislation targets biometric data collection
New York City is moving to ban the collection of biometric data, including facial recognition, in public places. City Council member Shahana Hanif has introduced legislation targeting these practices, which Mayor Zohran Mamdani called “an important response to this kind of an issue.” The proposed ban would expand on the city’s existing rule, in place since 2021, that requires businesses to disclose when they collect biometric data from visitors.
MSG’s surveillance practices spark controversy
The legislation follows criticism of Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSG) and its owner, James Dolan, for using facial recognition technology to monitor individuals both inside and outside its venues. Reports indicate that Dolan’s company maintains a database labeling some visitors—including performers—with descriptors such as “LGBTQIA,” though the reasons for these labels are unclear.
MSG’s practices came under scrutiny in 2021 when a woman was banned from Radio City Music Hall, a Dolan-owned venue, after facial recognition identified her as an attorney at a law firm involved in litigation against Dolan’s company. The woman herself was not part of the lawsuit. MSG has also sued media outlets, including WIRED, over their reporting on its surveillance practices.
What this means
Lazyfounder analysis — our interpretation, not reported fact.
This story signals a growing regulatory and public pushback against the unchecked use of biometric technologies, particularly in high-visibility industries like entertainment. For founders and operators, the developments in New York City highlight the risks of deploying facial recognition or similar tools without clear policies or safeguards. The potential for legal disputes, reputational damage, and compliance costs is rising, especially in markets with strict data protection norms. Companies using such technologies may need to revisit their practices to align with evolving legal standards and public expectations.
Key takeaways
- New York City’s proposed ban on biometric data collection could set a precedent for other cities or states, increasing compliance risks for businesses using facial recognition or similar technologies.
- The legal and reputational fallout from MSG’s surveillance practices—including lawsuits and public criticism—demonstrates the risks of opaque or discriminatory use of biometric data.
- Founders in industries like entertainment, retail, or security should assess whether their use of biometric tools aligns with current and upcoming regulations to avoid legal challenges or backlash.
Related on Lazyfounder
Sources
- TechCrunch · 2026-11-03
New York City’s Mamdani criticizes Madison Square Garden owner over surveillance tech
This story is an original summary drafted with AI by Lazyfounder from the reporting listed above and checked by automated validation. Facts are attributed to their original publishers; sections marked as analysis are Lazyfounder's. Where a source is in another language, facts were machine-translated and quotations are reported, not reproduced. Read the original coverage via the links, and see our AI policy and corrections policy.
About the author
Editor, Lazyfounder
Tarun Mottlia edits LazyFounders, covering Indian startups, funding rounds, AI and product launches. Every story on the site is AI-assisted and checked against its cited sources before publication.
More stories by Tarun MottliaGet the LazyFounder Brief
Startup, funding and AI news in a five-minute read. Join the early-access list.


