Judge orders OpenAI to turn over hiring records in Apple trade secrets case
A U.S. judge has ordered OpenAI to provide Apple with expedited access to hiring records and interview materials of former Apple employees, as part of a trade secrets lawsuit filed in July. The ruling grants Apple limited but critical discovery while denying broader requests for now.
Editor, Lazyfounder
30 SEC SUMMARY
- Apple sued OpenAI in July, alleging trade secret theft involving former Apple employees.
- A U.S. judge ordered OpenAI to provide Apple with expedited access to hiring records and interview materials of former Apple employees.
- OpenAI must turn over specified documents within 5 to 14 days, including private messages between employees.
- The ruling approves depositions for three former Apple employees now at OpenAI but denies broader discovery requests for now.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- Apple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in July, accusing it of trade secret theft involving former employees.
- U.S. District Judge Edward Davila ordered OpenAI to provide Apple with expedited access to hiring records and interview materials of former Apple employees.
- OpenAI must produce documents within 5 to 14 days, including private LINE messages between employees Chang Liu and Alyssa Peng.
- Depositions were approved for three former Apple employees now at OpenAI: Chang Liu, Alyssa Peng, and Tang Yew Tan.
- The judge denied Apple’s broader discovery requests but left room for narrower resubmissions.
Why Apple sued OpenAI
According to TechCrunch, Apple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in July, alleging a pattern of trade secret theft. The lawsuit claims former Apple employees used company laptops to download confidential materials before joining OpenAI and coached others on what information to bring during interviews.
Apple’s complaint centers on former employees who joined OpenAI’s consumer hardware and robotics groups, accusing them of misappropriating proprietary information.
What the court ordered
U.S. District Judge Edward Davila ruled that OpenAI must provide Apple with expedited access to specific hiring records and interview materials related to former Apple employees. OpenAI has five days to turn over documents it has already collected and 14 days for any additional related materials.
The court approved Apple’s request to access private LINE messages between OpenAI employees Chang Liu and Alyssa Peng, as well as interview documents involving former Apple employees. Depositions were also approved for three individuals named in the case: Chang Liu, Alyssa Peng, and Tang Yew Tan, all former Apple employees.
What the court denied
Judge Davila denied Apple’s broader discovery requests, including access to OpenAI’s research and development in areas such as metal finishes and power management. The court also rejected requests for information about what former Apple employees created while working at OpenAI.
The denial is not final; Apple may refine and resubmit narrower discovery requests in the future.
Recent tensions between OpenAI and regulators
The lawsuit adds to a series of regulatory and legal challenges facing OpenAI. In recent months, the company has faced scrutiny over safety concerns, including the termination of three researchers linked to a cybersecurity incident. OpenAI has also been adapting to regulatory requirements, such as introducing invisible watermarks for ChatGPT users in the European Union to comply with the EU AI Act.
Additionally, OpenAI has been at the center of geopolitical discussions about AI access, with governments like the UK restoring pre-release testing access after a U.S. policy reversal.
What this means
Lazyfounder analysis — our interpretation, not reported fact.
This ruling highlights the high stakes of hiring talent from competitors in the tech industry. For startups, especially those working on cutting-edge hardware or AI, the case underscores the importance of documenting compliance with intellectual property laws during recruitment. Failure to do so can lead to costly legal battles and reputational damage.
For founders, the decision also serves as a reminder that courts may limit discovery requests to avoid overreach, but targeted demands—such as those related to hiring practices—can still yield critical evidence. The case could set a precedent for how similar disputes are handled, particularly in industries where talent poaching is common.
Key takeaways
- Trade secret disputes require swift legal action to preserve evidence, particularly in fast-moving industries like technology.
- Judges may limit discovery requests to prevent overly broad or burdensome demands, but targeted resubmissions can still succeed.
- Hiring practices and employee communications are critical areas of scrutiny in intellectual property litigation.
- Startups recruiting from established tech companies should implement robust compliance measures to avoid allegations of trade secret misappropriation.
FAQ
What specific documents must OpenAI provide to Apple?
OpenAI must turn over hiring records, interview materials, and private LINE messages between employees Chang Liu and Alyssa Peng, as well as documents related to former Apple employees who applied for roles in OpenAI’s consumer hardware and robotics groups.
Can Apple request additional documents later?
Yes, the judge denied some of Apple’s broader discovery requests but left room for narrower resubmissions in the future.
Why did Apple sue OpenAI?
Apple alleges OpenAI engaged in a pattern of trade secret theft, including former Apple employees using company laptops to download confidential material and coaching others on what information to bring during interviews.
Related on Lazyfounder
Sources
- TechCrunch · 2026-10-13
Judge orders OpenAI to turn over hiring records in Apple trade secrets case
This story is an original summary drafted with AI by Lazyfounder from the reporting listed above and checked by automated validation. Facts are attributed to their original publishers; sections marked as analysis are Lazyfounder's. Where a source is in another language, facts were machine-translated and quotations are reported, not reproduced. Read the original coverage via the links, and see our AI policy and corrections policy.
About the author
Editor, Lazyfounder
Tarun Mottlia edits LazyFounders, covering Indian startups, funding rounds, AI and product launches. Every story on the site is AI-assisted and checked against its cited sources before publication.
More stories by Tarun MottliaGet the LazyFounder Brief
Startup, funding and AI news in a five-minute read. Join the early-access list.
