Gen Z uses AI the most but trusts it the least, Glassdoor study finds
A Glassdoor study reports that Gen Z employees are the most frequent users of AI tools in the workplace but also the most skeptical about their impact. While AI adoption is rising, trust in the technology is declining, particularly among younger workers who see it as a threat to career growth.
Editor, Lazyfounder

30 SEC SUMMARY
- A Glassdoor study found that Gen Z employees are the most frequent users of AI tools at work but are also the most skeptical about their impact.
- AI mentions in employee reviews surged 240% between May 2025 and May 2026, with positivity declining from 81% in 2019 to 43% in 2026.
- Gen Z workers are less likely to view AI favorably compared to Millennials and Gen X, with only 33% of their AI-related comments being positive.
- Concerns include AI replacing entry-level tasks, limiting career growth opportunities for junior employees.
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- Gen Z is the most active user of AI tools at work but also the most skeptical about their impact, according to a Glassdoor study.
- AI mentions in employee reviews increased by 240% between May 2025 and May 2026, with positive sentiment dropping from 81% in 2019 to 43% in 2026.
- Gen X workers were the most positive about AI (47% favorable comments), followed by Millennials (40%), while Gen Z lagged at 33%.
- Within Gen Z, 42% of comments from men were positive, compared to just 21% from women.
- AI is increasingly used for tasks like basic research, customer support, and content creation, which are often entry-level responsibilities.
- Stanford-linked research found that employment for 22- to 25-year-olds in AI-exposed roles was 19% lower than in less-exposed occupations.
AI adoption surges, but trust declines
A Glassdoor study analyzing employee reviews found that mentions of AI jumped 240% between May 2025 and May 2026. However, the tone of these mentions has shifted sharply. In 2019, 81% of reviews discussing AI were positive; by 2026, that figure had fallen to 43%. Meanwhile, 53% of reviews now frame AI as a drawback.
The decline in positivity is most pronounced among Gen Z workers. While Gen X employees were the most positive about AI, with 47% of comments framed favorably, Gen Z trailed at 33%. Millennials were in between, with 40% of their AI-related comments being positive.
Gen Z’s skepticism: career growth vs. AI
The study highlights a generational divide in how AI is perceived. For Gen Z, AI tools often replace tasks that provide early-career employees with foundational experience, such as basic research, customer support, and content creation. This raises concerns about whether AI is helping them build careers or eliminating the steps needed to gain expertise.
Stanford-linked research supports these concerns. It found that employment among 22- to 25-year-olds in occupations highly exposed to AI was 19% lower than in less-exposed roles. For junior employees, AI may feel less like a productivity tool and more like a barrier to skill development.
Glassdoor’s data also revealed a gender gap within Gen Z. While 42% of AI-related comments from Gen Z men were positive, only 21% of comments from Gen Z women shared the same sentiment.
Beyond job security: broader workplace concerns
Skepticism about AI among Gen Z extends beyond fears of job displacement. Employees cited forced AI adoption, workplace surveillance, and unrealistic productivity expectations as key concerns. Some also worried that AI tools distract companies from their core objectives.
For employers, this skepticism presents a challenge. While rolling out AI tools is straightforward, addressing their impact on job roles, training employees effectively, and ensuring these tools do not become a "productivity whip" requires more deliberate effort. The study suggests that if companies fail to manage these concerns, Gen Z could become the biggest critics of AI despite being its most active users.
What this means
Lazyfounder analysis — our interpretation, not reported fact.
Gen Z’s skepticism toward AI isn’t just about technology—it’s about job security, career progression, and trust in employers. For founders and operators, this signals a need to rethink how AI is introduced in the workplace. Simply deploying AI tools without addressing their impact on entry-level roles risks demotivating junior employees, who may see these tools as replacing the very tasks that help them learn and grow.
The generational gap in AI perception also underscores the importance of tailored communication. While experienced employees may view AI as a helpful assistant, younger workers are more likely to see it as a threat. Companies that invest in training, mentorship, and clear career pathways alongside AI adoption will be better positioned to retain Gen Z talent.
Additionally, the disparity in sentiment between Gen Z men and women suggests that broader workplace dynamics—such as inclusion and equity—may influence how AI is perceived. Employers must consider these factors to ensure AI adoption doesn’t inadvertently widen existing gaps.
Key takeaways
- Founders and employers must address Gen Z’s skepticism toward AI by clarifying how these tools integrate into career development rather than replace foundational tasks.
- Companies adopting AI for entry-level roles risk alienating junior employees if they do not provide alternative pathways for skill-building and progression.
- The generational divide in AI perception signals a need for tailored communication and training programs to align expectations across age groups.
- Negative sentiment around AI adoption—such as workplace surveillance and unrealistic productivity expectations—highlights operational risks for employers scaling these tools.
Sources
This story is an original summary drafted with AI by Lazyfounder from the reporting listed above and checked by automated validation. Facts are attributed to their original publishers; sections marked as analysis are Lazyfounder's. Where a source is in another language, facts were machine-translated and quotations are reported, not reproduced. Read the original coverage via the links, and see our AI policy and corrections policy.
About the author
Editor, Lazyfounder
Tarun Mottlia edits LazyFounders, covering Indian startups, funding rounds, AI and product launches. Every story on the site is AI-assisted and checked against its cited sources before publication.
More stories by Tarun MottliaGet the LazyFounder Brief
Startup, funding and AI news in a five-minute read. Join the early-access list.


